Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Eric Tolbert v. Fnu Stevenson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eric L. Tolbert for lack of jurisdiction. The court dismissed Tolbert's appeal of a district court order denying his motion to appoint counsel. The appeals court found that the district court's order was not a final order, nor was it an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, so the appeals court did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Eric Tolbert v. Fnu Stevenson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eric L. Tolbert for lack of jurisdiction. The court dismissed Tolbert's appeal of a district court order denying his motion to appoint counsel. The appeals court found that the district court's order was not a final order, nor was it an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, so the appeals court did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6956

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eric L. Tolbert for lack of jurisdiction. The court dismissed Tolbert's appeal of a district court order denying his motion to appoint counsel. The appeals court found that the district court's order was not a final order, nor was it an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, so the appeals court did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Eric Tolbert v. Fnu Stevenson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eric L. Tolbert for lack of jurisdiction. The court dismissed Tolbert's appeal of a district court order denying his motion to appoint counsel. The appeals court found that the district court's order was not a final order, nor was it an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, so the appeals court did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6956

    ERIC L. TOLBERT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    FNU STEVENSON; FNU DALRYMPLE; FRANKLIN STEELE; FNU NEELY;
    FNU PRESTON, Lieutenant; ROBERT LEWIS; BILLIE J. WEAVER; FNU
    HORN, Sergeant; FNU MULLIS, Sergeant; FNU BENNETT; FNU
    BRYANT, C.O.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00382-GCM)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2011

    Decided:

    October 21, 2011

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eric L. Tolbert, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eric L. Tolbert seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion to appoint counsel.

    This court may

    exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291


    (2006),

    and

    certain

    interlocutory

    and

    collateral

    orders,

    28

    U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial


    Indus.

    Loan

    Tolbert

    Corp.,

    seeks

    to

    337

    U.S.

    appeal

    is

    541,

    545-46

    neither

    (1949).
    final

    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.


    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    The

    order

    order

    nor

    an

    Accordingly, we
    We dispense with
    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like