Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tilley v. Scherer, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Jeffrey Tilley filed a § 1983 complaint against Courtney Scherer that was denied by the district court. Tilley appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit does not serve as binding legal precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6968

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jeffrey Tilley filed a § 1983 complaint against Courtney Scherer that was denied by the district court. Tilley appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit does not serve as binding legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Tilley v. Scherer, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jeffrey Tilley filed a § 1983 complaint against Courtney Scherer that was denied by the district court. Tilley appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit does not serve as binding legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6968

    JEFFREY K. TILLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COURTNEY SCHERER,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-96-455-R)
    Submitted:

    August 20, 1996

    Decided:

    August 30, 1996

    Before HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jeffrey K. Tilley, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Tilley v. Scherer, No. CA-96-455-R (W.D. Va. June 11, 1996).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like