Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McCue v. West, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Ella McCue sued Dr. Ilana Robbins West and the Hagerstown Surgical Clinic alleging negligence, lack of informed consent, and assault and battery related to medical treatment she received. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the lower court and that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-04-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-1868

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ella McCue sued Dr. Ilana Robbins West and the Hagerstown Surgical Clinic alleging negligence, lack of informed consent, and assault and battery related to medical treatment she received. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the lower court and that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    McCue v. West, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ella McCue sued Dr. Ilana Robbins West and the Hagerstown Surgical Clinic alleging negligence, lack of informed consent, and assault and battery related to medical treatment she received. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the lower court and that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-1868

    ELLA V. MCCUE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ILANA ROBBINS WEST, M.D., Doctor; HAGERSTOWN
    SURGICAL CLINIC, a partnership,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-97-4182-JFM)

    Submitted:

    February 26, 1999

    Decided:

    April 7, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Mark Andrew Cronin, CRONIN & SCARDINO, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania;
    Sharon N. Horner, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Frederick W.
    Goundry, III, VARNER & KASLICK, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ella McCue appeals the district courts order granting summary
    judgment in favor of the Defendants in her suit alleging negligence, lack of informed consent, and assault and battery arising
    from the medical treatment Dr. West provided her at the Hagerstown
    Surgical Clinic.

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we af-

    firm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See McCue v. West,

    No. CA-97-4182-JFM (D. Md. May 12, 1998).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like