Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Edmonds, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Steven Edmonds' motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons provided in its August 8, 2008 decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-02-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7680

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Steven Edmonds' motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons provided in its August 8, 2008 decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Edmonds, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Steven Edmonds' motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons provided in its August 8, 2008 decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7680

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    STEVEN ELLIS EDMONDS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (7:04-cr-00072-SGW-5)

    Submitted:

    January 14, 2009

    Decided:

    February 4, 2009

    Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Steven Ellis Edmonds, Appellant Pro Se.


    Thomas Linn Eckert,
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Roanoke,
    Virginia,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Steven

    Ellis

    Edmonds

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of


    his

    motion

    for

    reduction

    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    of

    sentence

    under

    18

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See United States v. Edmonds, No. 7:04-

    cr-00072-SGW-5 (W.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like