Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Ivan Dawkins, A/K/A Dollarhead, 67 F.3d 297, 4th Cir. (1995)
United States v. Ivan Dawkins, A/K/A Dollarhead, 67 F.3d 297, 4th Cir. (1995)
3d 297
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge.
(CR-93-7, CA-95-109-CV-3)
Ivan Dawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Howard Crawford Vick, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Dawkins, Nos. CR-93-7; CA-95-109-CV-
3 (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
AFFIRMED.