Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Iszard Ballard, Jr. v. Parris N. Glendening Saundra E. Banks Norman N. Yankellow Joseph J. Curran, 77 F.3d 467, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from February 26, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Iszard Ballard Jr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 77 F.3d 467 Docket: 95-7780

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from February 26, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Iszard Ballard Jr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Iszard Ballard, Jr. v. Parris N. Glendening Saundra E. Banks Norman N. Yankellow Joseph J. Curran, 77 F.3d 467, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from February 26, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Iszard Ballard Jr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    77 F.

    3d 467

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Iszard BALLARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Parris N. GLENDENING; Saundra E. Banks; Norman N.
    Yankellow; Joseph J. Curran, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-7780.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
    Decided Feb. 26, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-2770-JFM)
    Iszard Ballard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Ballard v. Glendening, No. CA-95-2770-JFM (D.Md. Oct.
    11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like