Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 1

91 F.

3d 133

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Charles Ulysses SMITH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES ARMY; Board of Military Correction;
Board of
Military Review, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 96-1103.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted June 20, 1996.
Decided June 28, 1996.

Charles Ulysses Smith, Appellant Pro Se.


Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his pro se complaint
under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 2675-80 (1995). We have
reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. United
States Army, No. CA-95-3483-H (D. Md. Dec. 6, 1995; Jan. 24, 1996). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

You might also like