Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Rosario v. Umesi, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Luis Rosario appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical staff and officers at the Wake County Jail. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling that Rosario was not entitled to relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Rosario v. Umesi, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views3 pages
    Luis Rosario appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical staff and officers at the Wake County Jail. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling that Rosario was not entitled to relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-12-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7705

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Luis Rosario appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical staff and officers at the Wake County Jail. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling that Rosario was not entitled to relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views3 pages

    Rosario v. Umesi, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Luis Rosario appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical staff and officers at the Wake County Jail. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling that Rosario was not entitled to relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7705

    LUIS ROSARIO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DOCTOR UMESI, Doctor in Wake County Jail; SERGEANT LONG,
    Staff Member, Wake County Jail; MR. PONCELET, Staff Member,
    Wake County Jail,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    DONNIE HARRISON, Wake County Sheriff; MR. GUNTER,
    County Jail Director; WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE,

    Wake

    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:07-ct-03171-BO)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 2009

    Decided:

    December 30, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Luis Rosario, Appellant Pro Se.


    John Albert Maxfield, COUNTY
    ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Luis

    Rosario

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.
    03171-BO

    Rosario v. Wake County Sheriffs Office, No. 5:07-ct(E.D.N.C.

    Sept.

    1,

    2009).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like