Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Altizer v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a § 1983 complaint filed by Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials. The district court denied relief on Altizer's complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or reasoning. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Altizer v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a § 1983 complaint filed by Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials. The district court denied relief on Altizer's complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or reasoning. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6065

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a § 1983 complaint filed by Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials. The district court denied relief on Altizer's complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or reasoning. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Altizer v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a § 1983 complaint filed by Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials. The district court denied relief on Altizer's complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or reasoning. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6065

    FRANK ERVIN ALTIZER, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE; RICHARD A. YOUNG; GEORGE
    DEEDS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-96-3-R)
    Submitted:

    May 16, 1996

    Decided:

    June 3, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Altizer v. Angelone, No. CA-96-3-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 3, 1996).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like