Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 19 views

    Henderson v. Doss, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jeremiah Henderson appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his civil complaint against James V. Doss, III. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The appeals court ruling affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Henderson's civil complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Henderson v. Doss, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    19 views2 pages
    Jeremiah Henderson appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his civil complaint against James V. Doss, III. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The appeals court ruling affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Henderson's civil complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1460

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jeremiah Henderson appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his civil complaint against James V. Doss, III. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The appeals court ruling affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Henderson's civil complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    19 views2 pages

    Henderson v. Doss, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jeremiah Henderson appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his civil complaint against James V. Doss, III. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The appeals court ruling affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Henderson's civil complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1460

    JEREMIAH HENDERSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JAMES V. DOSS, III,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Lynchburg.
    Norman K. Moon, District
    Judge. (6:07-cv-00006-nkm)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2007

    Decided:

    October 22, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jeremiah Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. Leggette, LEGGETTE


    LAW FIRM, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jeremiah Henderson appeals from the district courts
    order denying relief on his civil complaint.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Henderson v. Doss, No.

    6:07-cv-00006-nkm (W.D. Va. May 18, 2007).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like