Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bryant-Bunch v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    June Bryant-Bunch appealed a district court's denial of relief on her civil complaint against North Carolina prison officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and determined that the district court's reasons for denying relief, as stated in its orders from February 2003 and September/October 2007, were valid. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-04-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-2030

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    June Bryant-Bunch appealed a district court's denial of relief on her civil complaint against North Carolina prison officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and determined that the district court's reasons for denying relief, as stated in its orders from February 2003 and September/October 2007, were valid. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Bryant-Bunch v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    June Bryant-Bunch appealed a district court's denial of relief on her civil complaint against North Carolina prison officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and determined that the district court's reasons for denying relief, as stated in its orders from February 2003 and September/October 2007, were valid. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-2030

    JUNE BRYANTBUNCH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Prison; J. BOYD BENNETT, Director of
    Prison; ROBERT SMITH, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional
    Institution; LARRY DIAL, Assistant Superintendent of Eastern
    Correctional Institution; MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Governor and former
    Attorney General; ROY COOPER, Attorney General of North
    Carolina,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (2:02-cv-00034-BO)

    Submitted:

    April 24, 2008

    Decided:

    April 28, 2008

    Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    June BryantBunch, Appellant Pro Se.


    Joseph Finarelli, NORTH
    CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    June Bryant-Bunch appeals the district courts orders
    denying relief on her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    See Bryant-Bunch v. Beck,

    No. 2:02-cv-00034-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2003; filed Sept. 28, 2007


    & entered Oct. 1, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like