Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Hinton v. Pearce, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Jolly P. Hinton under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against multiple corrections officers and officials. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Hinton, but modified it to be without prejudice. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Hinton v. Pearce, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Jolly P. Hinton under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against multiple corrections officers and officials. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Hinton, but modified it to be without prejudice. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6058

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Jolly P. Hinton under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against multiple corrections officers and officials. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Hinton, but modified it to be without prejudice. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Hinton v. Pearce, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Jolly P. Hinton under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against multiple corrections officers and officials. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Hinton, but modified it to be without prejudice. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6058

    JOLLY P. HINTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MISS PEARCE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WESTBROOK;
    SERGEANT DAMMERMAN; SERGEANT RICHARDSON;
    PATRICIA HAGLER; HARRY ALLSBROOK; ROBERT
    ROHEX; SERGEANT CRAFFORD; SERGEANT JUSTICE;
    SERGEANT NICK; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADAM;
    CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUNTER; CORRECTIONAL
    OFFICER PEARCE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ODOM;
    CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TAYLOR; CORRECTIONAL
    OFFICER FLANAGAN; MR. MOORE; CAPTAIN MURPHY;
    LIEUTENANT CHERRY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-96-697-CT-H)
    Submitted:

    June 24, 1997

    Decided:

    September 3, 1997

    Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jolly P. Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.


    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jolly P. Hinton appeals the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court, but modify to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice. Hinton v. Pearce, No. CA-96-697-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

    You might also like