Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Curtis Edward Etheridge v. David W. Chester, Attorney General of North Carolina, 846 F.2d 70, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a petitioner, Curtis Edward Etheridge, seeking habeas corpus relief. The appeals court denied the petitioner a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had previously refused habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found the dispositive issues had already been authoritatively decided, so an appeal would be without merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Curtis Edward Etheridge v. David W. Chester, Attorney General of North Carolina, 846 F.2d 70, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a petitioner, Curtis Edward Etheridge, seeking habeas corpus relief. The appeals court denied the petitioner a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had previously refused habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found the dispositive issues had already been authoritatively decided, so an appeal would be without merit.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-05-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 846 F.2d 70 Docket: 88-7042

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a petitioner, Curtis Edward Etheridge, seeking habeas corpus relief. The appeals court denied the petitioner a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had previously refused habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found the dispositive issues had already been authoritatively decided, so an appeal would be without merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Curtis Edward Etheridge v. David W. Chester, Attorney General of North Carolina, 846 F.2d 70, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a petitioner, Curtis Edward Etheridge, seeking habeas corpus relief. The appeals court denied the petitioner a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had previously refused habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found the dispositive issues had already been authoritatively decided, so an appeal would be without merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    846 F.

    2d 70
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Curtis Edward ETHERIDGE, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    David W. CHESTER, Attorney General of North Carolina,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 88-7042.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 26, 1988.
    Decided May 12, 1988.

    Curtis Edward Etheridge, appellant pro se.


    Richard Norwood League, Office of Attorney General of North Carolina,
    for appellees.
    Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, CHAPMAN, and WILKINSON,
    Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal
    from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254
    would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been
    decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal,
    dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Etheridge v. Chester, C/A No. 87-512-HC (E.D.N.C. Dec. 30,
    1987).
    DISMISSED.

    You might also like