Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Annette Sharif v. R. Masterton, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Annette Sharif appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil complaint against the Department of the Army without prejudice. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the complaint and subsequent denial of Sharif's motion for reconsideration. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-10-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1585

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Annette Sharif appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil complaint against the Department of the Army without prejudice. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the complaint and subsequent denial of Sharif's motion for reconsideration. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Annette Sharif v. R. Masterton, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Annette Sharif appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil complaint against the Department of the Army without prejudice. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the complaint and subsequent denial of Sharif's motion for reconsideration. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1585

    ANNETTE SHARIF,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    R. PETER MASTERTON, Department of the Army,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:11-cv-00160-JRS)

    Submitted:

    September 29, 2011

    Decided:

    October 4, 2011

    Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Annette Sharif, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Annette

    Sharif

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28


    U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) (2006), and a subsequent order
    denying reconsideration.
    no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    Sharif v. Masterton, No. 3:11-cv-

    00160-JRS (E.D. Va. April 19, 2011; May 17, 2011).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like