Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Earl Holloway filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. Holloway appealed this decision. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision to accept the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. As such, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-01-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 106 F.3d 390 Docket: 96-7590

    Original Title

    Earl Holloway v. Tim Bethea, of "Outside Detail" at Evans Cor Rectional Institution Garvin Gaiel, Doctor at Evans Correctional Institution, 106 F.3d 390, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Earl Holloway filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. Holloway appealed this decision. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision to accept the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. As such, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Earl Holloway filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. Holloway appealed this decision. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision to accept the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. As such, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    106 F.

    3d 390

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Earl HOLLOWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Tim BETHEA, of "Outside Detail" at Evans Cor rectional
    Institution; Garvin Gaiel, Doctor at Evans
    Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-7590.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 9, 1997.
    Decided Jan. 24, 1997.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South
    Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA96-1906-3-22BC)
    Earl Holloway, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Earl Holloway appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Holloway v. Bethea, No. CA-96-1906-3-22BC (D.S.C. Sept. 26, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like