Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Allen v. Hunt, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Juan Fitzgerald Allen under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against James B. Hunt Jr. and Ralph Stamey. The district court denied Allen relief and Allen appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error, and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6259

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Juan Fitzgerald Allen under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against James B. Hunt Jr. and Ralph Stamey. The district court denied Allen relief and Allen appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error, and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Allen v. Hunt, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Juan Fitzgerald Allen under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against James B. Hunt Jr. and Ralph Stamey. The district court denied Allen relief and Allen appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error, and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6259

    JUAN FITZGERALD ALLEN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JAMES B. HUNT, JR.; RALPH STAMEY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-96-72-F)
    Submitted:

    July 23, 1996

    Decided:

    July 31, 1996

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Juan Fitzgerald Allen, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Allen v. Hunt, No. CA-96-72-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like