Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Elias Bermudez, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Elias Bermudez. Bermudez sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, which allows prisoners to challenge their sentences. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It therefore denied Bermudez a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-11-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7098

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Elias Bermudez. Bermudez sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, which allows prisoners to challenge their sentences. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It therefore denied Bermudez a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Elias Bermudez, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Elias Bermudez. Bermudez sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, which allows prisoners to challenge their sentences. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It therefore denied Bermudez a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7098

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ELIAS BERMUDEZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-96-251-A, CA-99-560-AM)

    Submitted:

    November 4, 1999

    Decided:

    November 10, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Elias Bermudez, Appellant Pro Se. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Elias Bermudez seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Elias Bermudez, Nos. CR-96-251-

    A; CA-99-560-AM (E.D. Va. July 15, 1999).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like