Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McSheffrey v. Henry, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of John McSheffrey's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and motion for reconsideration. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-09-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6847

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of John McSheffrey's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and motion for reconsideration. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    McSheffrey v. Henry, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of John McSheffrey's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and motion for reconsideration. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6847

    JOHN PATRICK MCSHEFFREY,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MARK A. HENRY, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-981543-AMD)

    Submitted:

    September 10, 1998

    Decided:

    September 24, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    John Patrick McSheffrey, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts orders denying relief
    on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition and denying his motion for
    reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district
    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McSheffrey v. Henry,
    No. CA-98-1543-AMD (D. Md. May 22 & June 2, 1998). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like