Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Michael J. Bushman, A/K/A Bush Hog, 7 F.3d 226, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    114 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling on an appeal from Michael J. Bushman of a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The court denied Bushman's request for oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-09-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 7 F.3d 226 Docket: 93-6207

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling on an appeal from Michael J. Bushman of a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The court denied Bushman's request for oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    114 views2 pages

    United States v. Michael J. Bushman, A/K/A Bush Hog, 7 F.3d 226, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling on an appeal from Michael J. Bushman of a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The court denied Bushman's request for oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    7 F.

    3d 226

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL J. BUSHMAN, a/k/a Bush Hog, DefendantAppellant.
    No. 93-6207.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 2, 1993.
    Decided: September 23, 1993.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Michael J. Bushman, Appellant Pro Se.
    Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, for Appellee.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED
    Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION
    1

    Michael J. Bushman appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under
    28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's

    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on


    the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bushman, Nos. CR-87-100N; CA-92-677-N (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 1992). We deny the motion for oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like