Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Baker v. US Postal Service, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    20 views2 pages
    Lori Baker appealed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, the United States Postal Service, in her civil suit alleging disability discrimination and related claims. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning. The appeals court denied the appellee's motion to strike appellant's exhibits and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-04-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-2691

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lori Baker appealed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, the United States Postal Service, in her civil suit alleging disability discrimination and related claims. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning. The appeals court denied the appellee's motion to strike appellant's exhibits and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    20 views2 pages

    Baker v. US Postal Service, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lori Baker appealed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, the United States Postal Service, in her civil suit alleging disability discrimination and related claims. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning. The appeals court denied the appellee's motion to strike appellant's exhibits and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-2691

    LORI J. BAKER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BULK MAIL CENTER;
    MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR., Postmaster General,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-546-2)

    Submitted:

    April 15, 1999

    Decided:

    April 21, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Lori J. Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lori Baker appeals the district courts order granting summary
    judgment in favor of her former employer in her civil action in
    which she alleged discrimination based upon disability and related
    claims.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.


    the reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on
    See Baker v. United States

    Postal Service, No. CA-97-546-2 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 1998).

    We deny

    Appellees motion to strike Appellants exhibits. We dispense with


    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like