Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Santos v. Newport News Police, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Pedro De Los Santos appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against the Newport News Police Department as time-barred. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling that the complaint was not filed within the statute of limitations period. The Court also denied De Los Santos' motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the issues were adequately addressed in existing court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-03-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7620

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Pedro De Los Santos appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against the Newport News Police Department as time-barred. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling that the complaint was not filed within the statute of limitations period. The Court also denied De Los Santos' motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the issues were adequately addressed in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Santos v. Newport News Police, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Pedro De Los Santos appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against the Newport News Police Department as time-barred. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling that the complaint was not filed within the statute of limitations period. The Court also denied De Los Santos' motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the issues were adequately addressed in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7620

    PEDRO DE LOS SANTOS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NEWPORT NEWS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Virginia,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (1:06-cv-00367-LMB-BR)

    Submitted:

    February 22, 2007

    Decided:

    March 2, 2007

    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Pedro De Los Santos, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Pedro De Los Santos appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his complaint as time-barred.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we deny De Los

    Santos motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm for the
    reasons stated by the district court.

    Santos v. Newport News

    Police Dept, No. 1:06-cv-00367-LMB-BR (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 22,


    2006; entered Aug. 24, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like