Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Alternative Behavioral SVC, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Roy Williams sued his former employer Alternative Behavioral Services for employment discrimination under Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Alternative Behavioral Services. Williams appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's thorough opinion that found Alternative Behavioral Services was entitled to summary judgment on Williams's Title VII claim. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-02-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-2138

    Original Title

    Williams v. Alternative Behavioral Svc, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Roy Williams sued his former employer Alternative Behavioral Services for employment discrimination under Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Alternative Behavioral Services. Williams appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's thorough opinion that found Alternative Behavioral Services was entitled to summary judgment on Williams's Title VII claim. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Williams v. Alternative Behavioral SVC, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Roy Williams sued his former employer Alternative Behavioral Services for employment discrimination under Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Alternative Behavioral Services. Williams appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's thorough opinion that found Alternative Behavioral Services was entitled to summary judgment on Williams's Title VII claim. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-2138

    ROY L. WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIORAL SERVICES,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-03-903)

    Submitted:

    January 26, 2005

    Decided:

    February 22, 2005

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Roy L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Warren David Harless, CHRISTIAN


    & BARTON, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Roy L. Williams appeals the district court order awarding
    summary judgment in favor of Alternative Behavioral Services on
    Williamss claim of employment discrimination in violation of Title
    VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a)(1)
    (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    thorough opinion and find no reversible error.


    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    Accordingly, we

    district

    court.

    See

    Williams v. Alternative Behavioral Servs., No. CA-03-903 (E.D. Va.


    Sept. 15, 2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like