Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Scheuerman v. Bozman, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Daniel Scheuerman's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint for the reasons stated in its March 1, 2010 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and that oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Scheuerman v. Bozman, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Daniel Scheuerman's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint for the reasons stated in its March 1, 2010 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and that oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6401

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Daniel Scheuerman's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint for the reasons stated in its March 1, 2010 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and that oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Scheuerman v. Bozman, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Daniel Scheuerman's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint for the reasons stated in its March 1, 2010 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and that oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6401

    DANIEL SCHEUERMAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    K. BOZMAN, Case Management; KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden of the
    Eastern Correction Institution,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
    Judge. (8:09-cv-01386-DKC)

    Submitted:

    June 1, 2010

    Decided:

    June 9, 2010

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Daniel Scheuerman, Appellant Pro Se.


    Nichole Cherie Gatewood,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Daniel Scheuerman appeals the district courts order
    dismissing

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    Scheuerman
    2010).
    legal
    before

    v.

    Bozman,

    No.

    8:09-cv-01386-DKC

    (D.

    Md.

    Mar.

    See
    1,

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like