Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Prade v. Jackson & Kelly, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    1) Estella Prade and James Jackson filed a civil action against Jackson and Kelly, Attorneys at Law, which was denied by the district court. 2) Prade and Jackson appealed the district court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision to accept the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny relief in the civil action.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-02-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-2712

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Estella Prade and James Jackson filed a civil action against Jackson and Kelly, Attorneys at Law, which was denied by the district court. 2) Prade and Jackson appealed the district court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision to accept the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny relief in the civil action.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Prade v. Jackson & Kelly, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Estella Prade and James Jackson filed a civil action against Jackson and Kelly, Attorneys at Law, which was denied by the district court. 2) Prade and Jackson appealed the district court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision to accept the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny relief in the civil action.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-2712

    ESTELLA PRADE; JAMES JACKSON,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    versus
    JACKSON AND KELLY, Attorneys at Law,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Robert Earl Maxwell,
    Senior District Judge. (CA-94-18-3)
    Submitted:

    January 27, 1998

    Decided:

    February 24, 1998

    Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Estella Prade, James Jackson, Appellants Pro Se. Richard D. Owen,
    Thomas Ryan Goodwin, GOODWIN & GOODWIN, Charleston, West Virginia,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellants appeal the district court's order denying relief in
    this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
    judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Prade v. Jackson & Kelly, No. CA94-18-3 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like