Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Keith, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case where Charles Keith appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for resentencing. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motions. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Keith, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case where Charles Keith appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for resentencing. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motions. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-07-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7949

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case where Charles Keith appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for resentencing. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motions. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Keith, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case where Charles Keith appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for resentencing. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motions. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7949

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CHARLES KEITH,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-97-4)

    Submitted:

    June 16, 2006

    Decided:

    July 11, 2006

    Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles Keith, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Keith appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion for reconsideration of the district courts order
    denying his motion for resentencing.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v. Keith,

    No. CR-97-4 (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 1, 2005).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like