Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Armstrong v. Osteen, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Arthur Armstrong's motion for leave to file a complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-02-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-2519

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Arthur Armstrong's motion for leave to file a complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Armstrong v. Osteen, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Arthur Armstrong's motion for leave to file a complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-2519

    ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WILLIAM L. OSTEEN,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District
    Judge. (MISC-00-108-1)

    Submitted:

    February 8, 2001

    Decided:

    February 13, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion for leave to file a complaint.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    Armstrong v. Osteen, No. MISC-00-108-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 20,

    2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like