Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Young v. Saunders, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Clyde Frank Young appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion denying Young's complaint. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-04-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7733

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Clyde Frank Young appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion denying Young's complaint. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Young v. Saunders, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Clyde Frank Young appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion denying Young's complaint. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7733

    CLYDE FRANK YOUNG,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LONNIE SAUNDERS, Warden; L. R. DAY, Assistant
    Warden; S. HOLLAR, Warden,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-00-791-7)

    Submitted:

    April 12, 2001

    Decided:

    April 17, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Clyde Frank Young, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Clyde Frank Young appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 2000).

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See Young v. Saunders, No. CA-00-791-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 22,

    2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like