Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Midland Mortgage Company v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case between Midland Mortgage Company and Wells Fargo Bank. The district court granted Wells Fargo's motion for summary judgment on Midland's negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims. The Court of Appeals considered Midland's arguments and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Midland Mortgage Company v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case between Midland Mortgage Company and Wells Fargo Bank. The district court granted Wells Fargo's motion for summary judgment on Midland's negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims. The Court of Appeals considered Midland's arguments and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-10-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1370

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case between Midland Mortgage Company and Wells Fargo Bank. The district court granted Wells Fargo's motion for summary judgment on Midland's negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims. The Court of Appeals considered Midland's arguments and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Midland Mortgage Company v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case between Midland Mortgage Company and Wells Fargo Bank. The district court granted Wells Fargo's motion for summary judgment on Midland's negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims. The Court of Appeals considered Midland's arguments and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1370

    MIDLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY, a South Carolina Corporation,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    WELLS FARGO BANK NA, a national banking association,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
    District Judge. (3:12-cv-00244-MBS)

    Submitted:

    October 22, 2013

    Decided:

    October 30, 2013

    Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William W. Watkins, Sr., WILLIAM W. WATKINS, P.A., Columbia,


    South Carolina, for Appellant.
    Ronald J. Tryon, Lawrence M.
    Hershon, PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN LLP, Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:

    district

    Midland

    Mortgage

    Company

    (Midland)

    courts

    judgment

    granting

    Wells

    appeals

    the

    Bank,

    NAs

    Fargo

    summary judgment motion on Midlands negligence and negligent


    misrepresentation

    claims.

    We

    have

    arguments and find no reversible error.


    the district courts judgment.

    considered

    Midlands

    Accordingly, we affirm

    Midland Mortgage Co. v. Wells

    Fargo Bank, NA, No. 3:12-cv-00244-MBS (D.S.C. Feb. 25, 2013).


    We

    dispense

    contentions

    with
    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like