Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Lewis v. Bledsoe, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Torreulla Lewis appealed a district court's denial of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. A panel of the Fourth Circuit, including Judges Wilkinson, Luttig, and Williams, affirmed the district court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors after reviewing the record. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The district court's denial of Lewis's § 2241 petition was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Lewis v. Bledsoe, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Torreulla Lewis appealed a district court's denial of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. A panel of the Fourth Circuit, including Judges Wilkinson, Luttig, and Williams, affirmed the district court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors after reviewing the record. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The district court's denial of Lewis's § 2241 petition was affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-03-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6057

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Torreulla Lewis appealed a district court's denial of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. A panel of the Fourth Circuit, including Judges Wilkinson, Luttig, and Williams, affirmed the district court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors after reviewing the record. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The district court's denial of Lewis's § 2241 petition was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Lewis v. Bledsoe, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Torreulla Lewis appealed a district court's denial of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. A panel of the Fourth Circuit, including Judges Wilkinson, Luttig, and Williams, affirmed the district court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors after reviewing the record. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The district court's denial of Lewis's § 2241 petition was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6057

    TORREULLA LEWIS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-05-506-JLK)

    Submitted: March 23, 2006

    Decided: March 30, 2006

    Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Torreulla Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Torreulla

    Lewis

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000).


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Lewis v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-506-JLK (W.D. Va. Dec. 2,

    2005).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like