Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Keith Milo Taylor v. James Martin, 801 F.2d 395, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    26 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Keith Milo Taylor under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against James Martin. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion adopting the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court also determined the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively, so they affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument based on the reasoning in the district court opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-09-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 801 F.2d 395 Docket: 86-6614

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Keith Milo Taylor under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against James Martin. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion adopting the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court also determined the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively, so they affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument based on the reasoning in the district court opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    26 views2 pages

    Keith Milo Taylor v. James Martin, 801 F.2d 395, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Keith Milo Taylor under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against James Martin. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion adopting the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court also determined the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively, so they affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument based on the reasoning in the district court opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    801 F.

    2d 395
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Keith Milo TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    James MARTIN, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 86-6614.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 23, 1986.
    Decided Sept. 25, 1986.

    Keith Milo Taylor, appellant pro se.


    Jacob L. Safron, Office of the Attorney General, for appellee.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion adopting the magistrate's
    recommendation discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently
    have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm
    the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Martin,
    C/A No. 85-1501-CRT (E.D.N.C., May 8, 1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like