Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Norman Ryman v. Bishop Robinson, Mr. Secretary Lanham, Mr. Commissioner, 946 F.2d 886, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    66 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Norman Ryman filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials Bishop Robinson and Lanham Commissioner. The district court denied Ryman relief and the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Ryman's appeal had no merit. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in that court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1991-10-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 946 F.2d 886 Docket: 91-6597

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Norman Ryman filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials Bishop Robinson and Lanham Commissioner. The district court denied Ryman relief and the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Ryman's appeal had no merit. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in that court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    66 views2 pages

    Norman Ryman v. Bishop Robinson, Mr. Secretary Lanham, Mr. Commissioner, 946 F.2d 886, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Norman Ryman filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials Bishop Robinson and Lanham Commissioner. The district court denied Ryman relief and the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Ryman's appeal had no merit. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in that court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    946 F.

    2d 886

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Norman RYMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Bishop ROBINSON, Mr. Secretary; Lanham, Mr.
    Commissioner,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 91-6597.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 23, 1991.
    Decided Oct. 18, 1991.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-91-976-S)
    Norman Ryman, appellant pro se.
    Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for
    appellees.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit
    Judges.
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:

    Norman Ryman appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Ryman v. Robinson, CA-91-976-S (D.Md. June
    3, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like