Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Black, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Roderick Black appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Black's motion for the reasons stated by the lower court. The appellate panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal points were adequately presented to the court in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-03-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 106092

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Roderick Black appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Black's motion for the reasons stated by the lower court. The appellate panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal points were adequately presented to the court in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Black, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Roderick Black appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Black's motion for the reasons stated by the lower court. The appellate panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal points were adequately presented to the court in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6092

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    RODERICK BLACK,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (2:94-cr-00015-BO-9)

    Submitted:

    March 16, 2010

    Decided:

    March 24, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Roderick Black, Appellant Pro Se.


    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Roderick
    denying

    Blacks

    Black
    motion

    appeals
    for

    18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).


    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    the

    sentence

    district

    courts

    reduction

    order

    pursuant

    to

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    United States v. Black,

    No. 2:94-cr-00015-BO-9 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 17, 2009; entered


    Dec. 18, 2009).

    We

    facts

    contentions

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    dispense

    court

    with

    oral

    argument

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    because

    presented

    would

    not

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like