Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Abdel-Aziz, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ahmed Malachi Abdel-Aziz's motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling denying Abdel-Aziz's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-01-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7502

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ahmed Malachi Abdel-Aziz's motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling denying Abdel-Aziz's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    United States v. Abdel-Aziz, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ahmed Malachi Abdel-Aziz's motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling denying Abdel-Aziz's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7502

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    AHMED MALACHI ABDEL-AZIZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (7:00-cr-00075-F)

    Submitted:

    December 21, 2006

    Decided:

    January 4, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ahmed Malachi Abdel-Aziz, Appellant Pro Se.


    Dennis M. Duffy,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ahmed Malachi Abdel-Aziz appeals the district courts
    order denying his motion for Relief Pursuant to Federal Rules of
    Civil Procedure Rule 60(b)(4).
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    United States v. Abdel-Aziz, No.

    7:00-cr-00075-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 24 & 25, 2006).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like