Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michael R. Fuller Nancy J. Halstead v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 98 F.3d 1334, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    Michael Fuller and Nancy Halstead appealed a district court order denying their request for an emergency restraining order and records against the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error based on the precedent set in Younger v. Harris that federal courts should abstain from interfering with ongoing state court proceedings. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 98 F.3d 1334 Docket: 96-1649

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Fuller and Nancy Halstead appealed a district court order denying their request for an emergency restraining order and records against the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error based on the precedent set in Younger v. Harris that federal courts should abstain from interfering with ongoing state court proceedings. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views1 page

    Michael R. Fuller Nancy J. Halstead v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 98 F.3d 1334, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Fuller and Nancy Halstead appealed a district court order denying their request for an emergency restraining order and records against the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error based on the precedent set in Younger v. Harris that federal courts should abstain from interfering with ongoing state court proceedings. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    98 F.

    3d 1334

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Michael R. FULLER; Nancy J. Halstead, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
    v.
    COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Defendant--Appellee.
    No. 96-1649.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 20, 1996.
    Decided Oct. 3, 1996.

    Michael R. Fuller, Nancy J. Halstead, Appellants Pro Se.


    Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying their request for an
    emergency restraining order and for records. We have reviewed the record and
    the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. See Younger v. Harris,
    401 U.S. 37 (1971). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Fuller v. Virginia, No. CA-96-611-A (E.D.Va. May 9, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like