Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Qadir v. Taylor, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Muhammad Waliyullah Karim Abdul Qadir in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Everette Taylor. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied Qadir's motion for a protective order and ruled that oral argument was not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-2697

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Muhammad Waliyullah Karim Abdul Qadir in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Everette Taylor. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied Qadir's motion for a protective order and ruled that oral argument was not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Qadir v. Taylor, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Muhammad Waliyullah Karim Abdul Qadir in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Everette Taylor. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied Qadir's motion for a protective order and ruled that oral argument was not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-2697

    MUHAMMAD WALIYULLAH KARIM ABDUL QADIR,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    EVERETTE TAYLOR,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
    (CA-95-920-19BC)
    Submitted:

    January 11, 1996

    Decided:

    January 23, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Muhammad Waliyullah Karim Abdul, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster
    McLeod, GRIGGS, SPRUILL & HARRIS, Cheraw, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order accepting
    the magistrate judge's recommendation and denying relief on his 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Qadir v. Taylor,
    No. CA-95-920-19BC (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for a protective order and dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like