Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Mitchell, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Jamal Mitchell's motion for return of real property. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the lower court's ruling denying Mitchell's motion for return of his real property for the reasons stated in the district court's order. The appeals court also denied Mitchell's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-11-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6895

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Jamal Mitchell's motion for return of real property. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the lower court's ruling denying Mitchell's motion for return of his real property for the reasons stated in the district court's order. The appeals court also denied Mitchell's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Mitchell, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Jamal Mitchell's motion for return of real property. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the lower court's ruling denying Mitchell's motion for return of his real property for the reasons stated in the district court's order. The appeals court also denied Mitchell's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6895

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-02-25)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2004

    Decided:

    November 12, 2004

    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jamal Mitchell appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion for return of real property.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v.

    Mitchell, No. CR-02-25 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2004 & entered May 6,
    2004).

    We deny Mitchells motion for appointment of counsel.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like