Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • USRP v. Langston, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of USRP in a case regarding environmental remediation costs. USRP had filed a complaint against Billy Wayne Langston, Jr. seeking damages for such costs. The district court found in favor of USRP, and the Court of Appeals found no reversible error upon review of the record. Additionally, the Court of Appeals denied Langston's motion to strike USRP's informal brief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-01-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-1528

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of USRP in a case regarding environmental remediation costs. USRP had filed a complaint against Billy Wayne Langston, Jr. seeking damages for such costs. The district court found in favor of USRP, and the Court of Appeals found no reversible error upon review of the record. Additionally, the Court of Appeals denied Langston's motion to strike USRP's informal brief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    USRP v. Langston, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of USRP in a case regarding environmental remediation costs. USRP had filed a complaint against Billy Wayne Langston, Jr. seeking damages for such costs. The district court found in favor of USRP, and the Court of Appeals found no reversible error upon review of the record. Additionally, the Court of Appeals denied Langston's motion to strike USRP's informal brief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-1528

    USRP (GANT 1), LLC; USRP (GANT 2), LLC,


    Plaintiffs - Appellees,
    versus
    BILLY WAYNE LANGSTON, JR., d/b/a Pit & Pump
    Tanks & Equipment, Incorporated,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever III,
    District Judge. (4:04-cv-00143-D)

    Submitted:

    November 30, 2006

    Decided:

    January 17, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Billy Wayne Langston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard C. Gaskins,


    Jr., Michael T. Champion, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, Charlotte, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Billy Wayne Langston, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order granting summary judgment in favor of USRP (Gant 1), LLC, and
    USRP (Gant 2), LLC (USRP) on USRPs complaint seeking damages for
    environmental remediation costs.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    See USRP v. Langston, No. 4:04-cv-

    00143-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2006). Additionally, we deny Langstons


    pending motion to strike USRPs informal brief.

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like