Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dotson v. Ozmint, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views3 pages
    James Preston Dotson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina prison officials and medical staff alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Dotson relief on his § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-08-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6743

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James Preston Dotson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina prison officials and medical staff alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Dotson relief on his § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views3 pages

    Dotson v. Ozmint, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James Preston Dotson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina prison officials and medical staff alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Dotson relief on his § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6743

    JAMES PRESTON DOTSON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JON OZMINT, Commissioner; COLIE RUSHTON,
    Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution;
    ALEWINE, Doctor; JOHN A. DAVIS; L. OLIVENCIAFONT,
    Doctor,
    Ridgeland
    Correctional
    Institution;
    MEDICAL
    STAFF
    AT
    MCCORMICK
    CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    MARK SANFORD,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
    (2:06-cv-01770-HFF)

    Submitted:

    July 24, 2007

    Decided:

    August 1, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Preston Dotson, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr.,
    John Eric Kaufmann, MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA,
    Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    James Preston Dotson appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Dotson v. Ozmint,

    No. 2:06-cv-01770-HFF (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 2007). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like