Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Harned v. Revell, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Keith Harned, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 2, 2010 order dismissing Harned's petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Harned v. Revell, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    1) Keith Harned, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 2, 2010 order dismissing Harned's petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-12-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7150

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Keith Harned, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 2, 2010 order dismissing Harned's petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Harned v. Revell, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Keith Harned, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 2, 2010 order dismissing Harned's petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7150

    KEITH V. HARNED,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    SARA REVELL,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (5:09-hc-02129-FL)

    Submitted:

    November 18, 2010

    Before SHEDD and


    Circuit Judge.

    AGEE,

    Circuit

    Decided:

    Judges,

    and

    December 2, 2010

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Keith V. Harned, Appellant Pro Se.


    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Keith
    district

    V.

    courts

    Harned,
    order

    federal

    dismissing

    prisoner,

    without

    appeals

    prejudice

    U.S.C.A. 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    his

    the
    28

    We have

    Accordingly,

    district

    court.

    Harned v. Revell, No. 5:09-hc-02129-FL (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2010).


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like