Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gadson, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Floyd Gadson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Gadson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. It also denied Gadson's motion to remand the case and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7376

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Floyd Gadson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Gadson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. It also denied Gadson's motion to remand the case and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Gadson, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Floyd Gadson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Gadson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. It also denied Gadson's motion to remand the case and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7376

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    FLOYD GADSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-93-33-MU, CA-95-438-3-MU)
    Submitted:

    April 16, 1998

    Decided:

    April 29, 1998

    Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Floyd Gadson, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Gadson, Nos. CR-93-33-MU; CA-95-438-3-MU
    (W.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to remand and
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like