Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mills v. Bell, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    Kenneth Leon Mills appealed the district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied Mills' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Mills' petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6519

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kenneth Leon Mills appealed the district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied Mills' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Mills' petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Mills v. Bell, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kenneth Leon Mills appealed the district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied Mills' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Mills' petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6519

    KENNETH LEON MILLS,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL T. W. BELL,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-00-936-1)

    Submitted:

    August 23, 2001

    Decided:

    August 29, 2001

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Kenneth Leon Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kenneth Leon Mills appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. Bell, No. CA-00-936-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14,
    2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like