Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tinsley v. Corrections Corp., 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Daniel Tinsley appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Tinsley's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court, which had dismissed the complaint. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-01-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7495

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Daniel Tinsley appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Tinsley's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court, which had dismissed the complaint. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Tinsley v. Corrections Corp., 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Daniel Tinsley appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Tinsley's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court, which had dismissed the complaint. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7495

    DANIEL TINSLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA; MR. MAYO,
    Lieutenant; MR. HICKS, Nurse; MR. BISHOP,
    Lieutenant,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (2:07-cv-00382-RBS)

    Submitted:

    January 17, 2008

    Decided:

    January 28, 2008

    Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Daniel Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Daniel

    Tinsley

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915A(b) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find that this

    appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the

    reasons stated by the district court. Tinsley v. Corrections Corp.


    of America,

    No. 2:07-cv-00382-RBS (E.D. Va., Aug. 23, 2007).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like