Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Jones v. Correctional Care Solutions, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Dwight Xavier Jones on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 23, 2010 order. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Jones v. Correctional Care Solutions, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Dwight Xavier Jones on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 23, 2010 order. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-10-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7111

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Dwight Xavier Jones on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 23, 2010 order. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views3 pages

    Jones v. Correctional Care Solutions, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Dwight Xavier Jones on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 23, 2010 order. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7111

    DWIGHT XAVIER JONES,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS; DENNIS A. TRACY; SERGEANT
    KLAUSEN, Lexington County Detention Center; NFN MICKEN,
    Lexington County Detention Center: JAMES R. METTS, Lexington
    County Sheriffs Department,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    LEXINGTON COUNTY SHERIFFS
    COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,

    DEPARTMENT,

    LCMANET;

    LEXINGTON

    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
    Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (0:09-cv-00269-HMH)

    Submitted:

    September 28, 2010

    Decided:

    October 6, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dwight Xavier Jones, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amanda R. Maybank,
    MAYBANK LAW FIRM, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina; Daniel C.

    Plyler, DAVIDSON, MORRISON


    Carolina, for Appellees.

    &

    LINDEMANN,

    PA,

    Columbia,

    South

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dwight Xavier Jones appeals the district courts order
    adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we

    affirm

    Jones v.

    for

    the

    Corr.

    Care

    July 23, 2010).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    reasons

    stated

    Solutions,

    No.

    by

    the

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    district

    0:09-cv-00269-HMH

    court.
    (D.S.C.

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like