Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    George Allen Porter v. Edward W. Murray, 89 F.3d 829, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed, in a per curiam opinion, the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the respondent. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's decision after remand. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    George Allen Porter v. Edward W. Murray, 89 F.3d 829, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed, in a per curiam opinion, the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the respondent. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's decision after remand. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 89 F.3d 829 Docket: 95-8120

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed, in a per curiam opinion, the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the respondent. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's decision after remand. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views1 page

    George Allen Porter v. Edward W. Murray, 89 F.3d 829, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed, in a per curiam opinion, the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the respondent. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's decision after remand. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    89 F.

    3d 829

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    George Allen PORTER, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 95-8120.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 14, 1996.
    Decided June 13, 1996.

    George Allen Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    George Allen Porter appeals from a district court decision, issued after remand,
    granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent. We have reviewed the
    district court opinion and find no reversible error. Therefore, we affirm
    substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Porter v. Murray, No. CA94-433-AM (E.D.Va. Nov. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like