Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Moore v. Haines, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a court case where Donnie Moore appealed the district court's denial of relief on his habeas corpus petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning as explained in its opinion dated May 14, 2001. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-10-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6904

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a court case where Donnie Moore appealed the district court's denial of relief on his habeas corpus petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning as explained in its opinion dated May 14, 2001. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Moore v. Haines, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a court case where Donnie Moore appealed the district court's denial of relief on his habeas corpus petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning as explained in its opinion dated May 14, 2001. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6904

    DONNIE MOORE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WILLIAM HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-99-20-2)

    Submitted:

    October 17, 2001

    Decided:

    October 26, 2001

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Donnie Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Donnie Moore appeals the district courts order denying relief
    on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
    2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm the

    district courts order on the reasoning of the district court.


    Moore v. Haines, No. CA-99-20-2 (N.D.W. Va. May 14, 2001).*

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    The district court granted Moores request for a certificate


    of appealability.
    2

    You might also like