Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    United States v. Fuller, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Daryl Andre Fuller's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Fuller, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Daryl Andre Fuller's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-11-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7246

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Daryl Andre Fuller's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Fuller, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Daryl Andre Fuller's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7246

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    DARYL ANDRE FULLER,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (7:98-cr-00076-HMH-1)

    Submitted:

    November 13, 2008

    Decided:

    November 21, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Daryl Andre Fuller, Appellant Pro Se.


    Arthur Bradley Parham,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Daryl Andre Fuller appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18
    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    United States v. Fuller,

    No. 7:98-cr-00076-HMH-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like