Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Peay v. Guiton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Benjamin Shabazz Peay filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical staff at a prison alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied Peay relief and accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the denial of Peay's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Peay v. Guiton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views3 pages
    Benjamin Shabazz Peay filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical staff at a prison alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied Peay relief and accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the denial of Peay's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6688

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Benjamin Shabazz Peay filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical staff at a prison alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied Peay relief and accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the denial of Peay's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views3 pages

    Peay v. Guiton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Benjamin Shabazz Peay filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical staff at a prison alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied Peay relief and accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the denial of Peay's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6688

    BENJAMIN SHABAZZ PEAY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NURSE GUITON; DOCTOR LINDSEY; STEPHEN KAFTAN,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    GEORGE L. MCBANE, U. S. Marshal,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CA-94-520-2)
    Submitted:

    June 28, 1996

    Decided:

    August 14, 1996

    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Benjamin Shabazz Peay, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Moore Lewis, COUNTY
    ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's orders and opinion accepting
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Peay v. Guiton, No. CA-94-520-2 (M.D.N.C. July 6, 1995; Mar.
    29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like