Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    May v. Horton, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by James Anthony May of a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    May v. Horton, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by James Anthony May of a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-12-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7080

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by James Anthony May of a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    May v. Horton, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by James Anthony May of a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7080

    JAMES ANTHONY MAY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MELVIN A. HORTON; BOYD BENNETT; HATTIE B. PIMPONG; CAPTAIN
    BROWN; S. BANKS; SGT. KORWIN; CARL E. BATTLE; ROBERT C.
    LEWIS, Dir. Div. of Prisons; ROY COOPER, Attorney General,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:09-ct-03081-BO)

    Submitted:

    November 18, 2010

    Before SHEDD and


    Circuit Judge.

    AGEE,

    Circuit

    Decided:

    Judges,

    and

    December 1, 2010

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Anthony May, Appellant Pro Se.


    Peter Andrew Regulski,
    Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, Raleigh,
    North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James Anthony May appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    May v. Horton, No. 5:09-ct-03081-BO (E.D.N.C. July 29,

    2010).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like