Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Davey James Reedy v. Chief Judge Koontz Commonwealth of Virginia, 14 F.3d 596, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Davey James Reedy's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Chief Judge Koontz and the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal to be without merit, affirming the district court's reasoning that Reedy was not entitled to relief. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-01-24 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 14 F.3d 596 Docket: 93-7170

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Davey James Reedy's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Chief Judge Koontz and the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal to be without merit, affirming the district court's reasoning that Reedy was not entitled to relief. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Davey James Reedy v. Chief Judge Koontz Commonwealth of Virginia, 14 F.3d 596, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Davey James Reedy's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Chief Judge Koontz and the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal to be without merit, affirming the district court's reasoning that Reedy was not entitled to relief. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    14 F.

    3d 596
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Davey James REEDY, Plaintiff Appellant,


    v.
    Chief Judge KOONTZ; Commonwealth of Virginia,
    Defendants Appellees.
    No. 93-7170.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
    Decided Jan. 24, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    Davey James Reedy, appellant Pro Se.
    W.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior
    Circuit Judge.

    PER CURIAM
    1

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Reedy v. Chief Judge Koontz, No. CA-93735-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like