Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Harrison v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Reginald Thomas Harrison seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's denial of Harrison's petition. The court denied a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. The court also denied a certificate of appealability to the extent necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-11-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6548

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Reginald Thomas Harrison seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's denial of Harrison's petition. The court denied a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. The court also denied a certificate of appealability to the extent necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Harrison v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Reginald Thomas Harrison seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's denial of Harrison's petition. The court denied a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. The court also denied a certificate of appealability to the extent necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6548

    REGINALD THOMAS HARRISON,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
    (CA-95-648-3)
    Submitted:

    October 8, 1996

    Decided:

    November 21, 1996

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Reginald Thomas Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine P. Baldwin,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Reginald Thomas Harrison seeks to appeal the magistrate
    judge's* order denying relief on his petition under 28 U.S.C.
    2254 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death
    Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 114. We have
    reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable
    cause and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate
    judge. Harrison v. Angelone, No. CA-95-648-3 (E.D. Va., Mar. 14,
    1996). To the extent necessary we also deny a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge


    pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) (1994).
    2

    You might also like